Invasion of Privacy by Employee Monitoring Essay

Employee supervise has been a serious controversial issue in the modern workplaces besides its necessity. There are many technological charge methods are being use today, and it does not only monitor the metre of work but the quality. Many employers cogitate that the observe helps to increase productiveness and customer service application and control and keep the business in an ideal, stable shape. They sometimes use it to determine ones promotions and support decisions as well as to reinforce disciplinary actions.However, what about employees privacy? Do employers cipher that the current monitoring situation is real fair to their employees? Lots of employers use different types of monitoring methods including computer monitoring, video recording control, investigators, undercover operatives, spying, eavesdropping, wiretapping, and electronic mail and voice mail. All these methods are derived from gamey applied science conduct made it so easy for those who are monitori ng to overstep the boundaries from business information to private information.Many computer programs discontinue employers to access and monitor employees activities such as netmail communication, keyboard activity, and website see history. A frequently debated issue is whether an employer has the right to read and check employee e-mail and voice messages. One recent survey shows that much than 73% of companies hunt or read employee files, e-mail messages, web connections, and other networking communication technology (Shelly & Vermaat, 2011, p. 590). Another data shows 25% of them have fired employees for mis use communication technology.The fuss is that currently, there is no privacy laws exist relating to employee e-mail even though several lawsuits have been filed for many years against employers because many people believe that such internal employee communications should be private. (Slobovnik and Stuart 144-160) Another method of surveillance that is commonly used in a workplace is video recording. This is the nigh effective form of monitoring yet. However, there are restrictions regarding the legality of utilize this form. It is defined as illegal if there is audible recording on with the images in the tape.Employees must know that they are being recorded, and most of all, images should not be taken in any undesignated area such as restrooms. In fact, there are some benefits from video surveillance, including increased caoutchouc on the job, deter employees from stealing, promote good behavior, and evoke be used as evidence of a crime. However, video surveillance also do-nothing create a false sense of security and a come down in morale. Imagine if someone is watching where you go and what you do. You might think as if this is not a human workplace but more like a prison. It is absolutely a privacy invasion for employees.The most recent invention of technological surveillance is a Smartcard. One statistic says that 53% of U. S. companies a re using Smartcard, and the numbers are increasing rapidly. It simply controls employees strong-arm activities within the company it allows company to track every personal activity from using cell phones to visiting information. Invasion of privacy is a ontogeny concern among employees. Electronic monitoring without informing employees that it is taking place is no different than spying. Monitoring is a supervisory incision, not a tool for employee surveillance (CSE, 2006). Monitoring is a simple way of invading employees privacy.For example, computer data banks, telephone and video monitoring, active badges, and other monitoring techniques make the private lives of workers easier to delve into without detection (Mishra, J. M Crampton, S. M 1998). Employers can maintain the productivity and accuracy of their employees without invading their personal lives by using motivation methods. Punishments should be followed for those who break the companys policy. However, employers also ha ve to protect their employees right as a human being.