.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Men and Mice

Literature Criticism Es hypothesise In essence, Of Mice and Men is a novella or so dreamings and aspirations. John Steinbeck rates the novel joined to the American Dream during the 1930s Great Depression, when high unemployment made luck of poor drifters struggle in California with a naive conjecture of starting a new animation by owning a secondary humans of pull down. The two mostly represented characters under that background, George and Lennie, who be gipsy workers from California searching for work on ranches in Soledad, sh atomic number 18 an bare dream of live off the fatta the Ian (14). Hence, dreams re integrated with hope, humanity, and fate.Firstly, as a true reflection of the 1930s Great Depression in American, the yarn suggests that the nature of human dreams is a hope to escape from grim reality with the integral point of being independent and living happily. By creating dreams, the life is infused with a driving motive of ambition while, without dreams an d aspirations, life would lack boot and meaning, which is possible to make human sinking into despair. To George and Lennie, the dream of having a thin acreage farm means Joys of self dependence, ecurity, and being their own boss, handle well deem a big vegetable patch and a hunt down hutch and chickens.And when it rains in the winter, we II Just say the hell with goin to work, and well mannikin up a fire in the stove and set rough it an listen to the rain comin down on the roofNuts (14-15) through and through the comparison to other ranch hands, George recognizes that he can non simply take back such a meaningless life with the grind and poverty of working on ranch, as George described in the book Guys like us, that work on ranches, are the loneliest guys in the human beings. They got no family. They don t belong no placeThey aint got nothing to look ahead to. (13-14) This makes George believe that Lennie and him are in a unique situation, because they share a symbiotic relationship ( Halyersmcq) by depending each other to provide a sense of yearning for a small land to dwell in happiness, after their enduring affliction on ranch. So, this is why George claims that With us it aint like that. We got a future. We got somebody to bubble to that gives a damn about us. (14) Secondly, through Lennie s killing of Curleys married woman which eventually results in their dream lost,Steinbeck shows his audience that Just simply having and overlap a dream is not enough to bring it to reality, due to the needful obstacles. Each person must be aware that obstacles once against their dream persist to be difficult but not insurmountable, as long as they work hard and focus entirely on the eventual accusative otherwise, the dream would be n evermore within reach, or even oppress by the cruel world. The intellectual handicap of Lennie limits the possibility of achieving their dream, which makes George feel that it is perpetually hard to keep Lennie out of trouble and keep them on drop behind for dream.As a result, Lennies innocent preoccupation with touching soft objects becomes the undoing of their dream in the end. In the tarradiddle, when Lennie strokes the hair of Curleys wife by irritating herself, he tries to make her calm with yelling that Oh Please dont do none of that, George gonna say I done a bad thing. He aint gonna let me pass no rabbits. (91), but finally Lennie unintentionally kills her of did that. Georgell be mad. (92) At this point, it is the apparent desire of Lennie to keep dream safe but actually his retroversion on the hair of Curley s wife that destroys heir dream eventually.Therefore, this raillery also confirms the ultra negative assertion from Crooks, who is a black stable-hand in the novel, that it is as impossible for ranch hands to get as a piece of land. l seen hundreds of men come by on the highroad an that same damn thing in their heads. Hundreds of them. They come, an they quit an go on an every damn one of ems got a little piece of land in his head. An never a God damn one of em ever gets it. Just like heaven. Everbody wants a little piece of Ian. I see a plenty of books out here. Nobody never gets to heaven, and nobody gets no land. Its Just in their head.There all the time pratein about it, but its Jus in their head. (74) Thirdly, the idea that dream is to a large extent reigned over by the philosophy of fate is reinforced in the story. Steinbeck hints to the reader that fate keeps you set where you are, and no matter what you do, fate will keep you controlled by what is open to you in your life style. (Haylersmcq) In the story, because George and Lennie are unable to enjoy their arrangement in the ranch all the ime, they desire to own a piece of land and start a new life but insofar fate is against them and breaks their dream, when the goal seems Just within their grasp.Then, George and Lennie are once again stuck where they had started, with nothing. (Haylersmcq) Perhaps, this ending makes George to some extent perceive that their dream is bound to be a failure regardless how much effort they make, due to the masterless fate. So, this is why he says softly to Candy at the end of story that l think I knowed from the very first. I think I knowed wed never do her. He usta like o hear about it so much I got to thinking maybe we would. (94) However, another important character, deoxidize, who is known as the prince of the ranch (33), seems different from George and Lennie in the story, because he is not enslaved by dreams instead, he shows his happiness and satisfaction on working as a mule skinner in the ranch. Steinbecks depiction on tenuous makes him a bit of a perfectionist with charismatic personality and excellent skills, as capable of driving ten, sixteen, even twenty mules with a single line of reasoning to the leaders. He was capable of killing a fly on the heelers prey with a bull whip without touching the mule.There was a gravi ty in his manner and a quiet so profound that all talk stopped when he spoke. His authority was so great that his word was taken on my subject, be it politics or love. This was Slim, the Jerkline skinner. (33) It allows us to see that Slim is one of those odd and rare individuals who are able to find and accept their position in the work and life, instead of to challenge the fate, because the nature of this espousal is a kind of inner peace which could let people have a clear vision of what they want to get (Mwestwood).To conclude, in Of Mice and Men, dreams are integrated with hope, reality, and fate. The nature of dreams is a hope but there are still obstacles to overcome in reality. In addition, dreams are controlled by the fate, which is always so irresistible and unchallenged that to accept your position in the world is more important than to have a dream. Reference List 1 . Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York Penguim, 1993. 2. Hylersmcq. Characters dreams for a bette r life within mice and men? Web. Jan 28, 2012. 3. Mwestwood. why doesn t Slim share other men s dreams in Of Mice and Men?

No comments:

Post a Comment