Law/criminal Justice Case Briefs

Terry v . Ohio392 U .S . 1 (1967FACTSA plain interchange state policeman observed Terry and two different custody involved in suspicious movement on the passageway . The police police ships officer believed that they were planning to drench shop . The officer stopped the persons and frisked the threesome men and determine weapons concealed on the person of Terry and Chiltron . They were charged at a lower place [392 U .S . 1 , 2] . Terry was convicted and was sent to prison for three months by the running court . Ohio court of appeals corroborate the time and the Ohio irresponsible coquette refused to hear the baptistry as it snarl that no substantial constitutional question was involved . The US Supreme hook decided to hear the case as the poop Amendment decent against unreasonable bet and transports was appli ed to the case . This right was match against the right of a police officer [392 U .S .

1 , 3] to make a reasonable front for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerousU S Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision affirmed the judgmentISSUEWhether the search and seizure of Terry and others was in violation of the fourth AmendmentHOLDINGNo . A search beneathtaken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons found on Terry and other could be presented as depict against Terry and the other personsRATIONALETerry contended that he was searched and seized in violation o f the Fourth Amendment and the evidence of..! .If you want to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper